Much ado about nothing…

Four years ago, I wrote a series of articles for the Distributist Review, called “Navigating the Electoral Milieu”, where I criticized more or less every candidate, with some praise for Ron Paul among my severe criticism of him.

Having briefly reviewed the Republican debates, I can only come to the conclusion (which I have maintained for a very long time) that our national political life is all a sham. There may indeed be sincere individuals who think they can accomplish some good, but the reality is they don’t.

The Republican milieu is not much different from the last time around. First off, we have Jeb Bush, if we want a replay of 8 years of W. He makes gaffes just as bad as his older brother (though not as puerile) and waffles frequently, knowing that the base is increasingly anti-war while all his backers are the military industrial complex. A lot of people think he is great because he is Catholic, as if that lessons the positive evil he will unleash as president.  Then there is Huckabee, for what the third time now? He nicely invents himself as a true, prayerful conservative, nearly every time. Then there is Carson—what exactly is he running for again? Oh, the economy, right. Then we have Carly Fiona, we need a republican alternative to Hillary! Rubio talks a good game, but them he is open borders. Moreover he has no experience. He is a first term senator. Then again there is Obama—exactly. Do we want another one of those? Then there are a bunch of people I recognize, don’t know much about, except that when they talk they sound like everyone else.

Continue reading

Pope Leo XIII on the relics of St. James at Compostella

St. James the Moor slayer

Today is the feast of St. James, the brother of St. John the Evangelist, who evangelized Spain and was martyred by Herod Agrippa. His relics were transferred back to Spain and are today preserved in Compostella. Here I am providing Pope Leo XIII’s document Deus Omnipotentis, where he verifies the relics interred there are in fact of St. James the Apostle. This document is not on the internet anywhere (including the Vatican), but I found it on the Acta Sancta Sedis. It is entirely in Latin, for now, and it may contain some OCR errors (the Vatican did the OCR, not me!) I will return to this at some point and make a translation, when I am less bogged down.

DEUS OMNIPOTENS
LEO EPISCOPUS
SERVUS SERVORUM DEI
AD PERPETUAM REI MEMORIAM.

Deus Omnipotens, qui mirabilis est in Sanctis suis, providentissime voluit, ut, quum eorum animae caelo receptae gaudio perfundantur sempiterno, corpora condita terris singulari observantia colantur ab hominibus et religionis splendore honestentur. — In his vero Dei providentia et misericordia luculenter apparet, qui cum multa sinat per ea divinitus accidere, simul et utilitati consulit nostrae, et gloriae, quam sancti sui consequuntur in terris. Haec enim caelitum beatissimorum pignora, quae nobiscum manent, quoties invisimus, toties admirabilem praeclarissimarum virtutum seriem, quibus illi in mortali vitae cursu in exemplum ceteris praeluxere, memoria repetimus, et ad eas imitandas vehementer adducimur. Sunt autem , teste Ioanne Damasceno, sanctorum corpora perennes in Ecclesia fontes, ex quibus tamquam rivuli salutares effunduntur in populos christianos dona caelestia, et ea omnia quibus maxime indigemus. — Quapropter non mirum est si providentis Dei consilio nonnulla sanctorum corpora, quae antea in oblivion posteritatis velut in tenebris delitescebant, bis potissimum temporibus in lucem prodeant, quibus et Ecclesia maximis agitatur fluctibus, et egent christiani acriori ad virtutem incitamento. Hoc nostro vertente saeculo cum a potestate tenebrarum teterrimum indictum fuerit bellum adversus Dominum et adversus Christum eius, auspicato quidem et divinitus inventi sunt sacri cineres sancti Francisci Assisiensis, sanctae Clarae Virginis Legiferae, sanctorum Ambrosii Pontificis Doctoris, Gervasii et Protasii martyrum, Philippi et Iacobi Apostolorum. — Horum in numerum adsciscendi sunt sanctus IACOBUS MAIOR Apostolus et discipuli eius Athanasius et Theodorus, quorum corpora nuper in templo principe civitatis Compostellanae reperta sunt.

Ex constanti et pervulgato apud omnes sermone, iam inde ab Apostolorum aetate, memoriae proditum est, publicisque Decessorum Nostrorum litteris confirmatum, sancti Iacobi corpus, postquam ille ab Rege Herode capitis damnatus martyrium fecerat, a duobus discipulis eius, Athanasio et Theodoro clam fuisse subductum. Hi cum valde metuerent reliquias sancti Apostoli nullas futuras, si Iudaei corpore potirentur, eo in navim imposito solverunt ex Iudaea, deinde sospite transmissione attigere Hispaniam, eamque circumvecti ad extremas Gallaeciae oras appulerunt, ubi, uti pia et antiqua traditio habet, post Christi in caelum ascensum sanctus Iacobus divino consilio apostolico munere functus erat. Ibi quum Hispaniensem civitatem quae Iria Flavia nominabatur, accessissent , in praediolo quodam manere decreverunt, mortalesque Apostoli exuvias, quas secum avexerant, in crypta saxo defossa intra loculum romano opere constructum condiderunt, parvumque super erexerunt sacellum. Sed exacto vitae cursu cum Athanasius et Theodorus naturae concessissent, christiani, qui ea loca incolebant, tum propter eximiam de duobus viris opinionem, tum ne hi a corpore quod in vita sancte asservaverant post mortem seiungerentur, ambos in eodem sepulcro composuerunt unumquemque ad Apostoli latus. — Vexatis paullo post caesisque christianis, ubicumque terrarum Romani Imperatores dominabantur, sacrum hypogeum delituit aliquandiu. Verum ubi, tranquillitate parta, apud Hispanos homines, qui praecipua sancti Iacobi religione tenebantur, de translato eius corpore fama percrebuit, ad sepulturae locum concursus fieri coepit, haud minori fortasse pietatis studio quam quo Romae et alibi sepulcra Principum Apostolorum, et Hieromartyrum coemeteria visebantur. Labentibus vero annis cum barbari primum. deinde Arabes imperio ductuque Muzae invasissent in Hispaniam, et eas praesertim regiones, quae mare adiacent crebris incursionibus divexarent, sacer sepulcri loculus, exciso et everso sacello, sub ruinarum mole in obscuritate latuit diuturna. — Non tamen vetustate obliterata est apud Hispanos sacri pignoris memoria. Ineunte enim saeculo IX cum Rex Alfonsus, qui dictus est Castus, Hispaniam obtineret, et Iriae Fla viae Ecclesiae datus esset Episcopus Theodomirus, super cryptam, quae sancti Iacobi et duorum discipulorum reliquias contegebat, constans fama est veluti refixam caelo stellam splendidissimam apparuisse, quae suo fulgore indicium faceret loci, ubi sacri cineres conditi fuerunt. Episcopus Theodomirus tanto felix auspicio auctori Deo supplicationes indixit, deinde submotis reiectisque veteris sacelli ruderibus, eo investigando pervenit, ubi, tamquam in cognato sepulcro, tria sanctorum corpora distinctis loculis iacebant. Tunc ut locus ille religione sanctus humanis esset praesidiis munitior, murum in circuitu eduxit, sacrumque thesaurum firmis substructionibus circumsepsit. Quae res ut ad aures Regis Alfonsi pervenerunt ad sanctum Apostoli sepulcrum venerabundus statim accessit, vetus sacellum in novam formam a solo reficiendum curavit, iussitque, fundi illius possessionem terminis ad tria millia prolatis, in templi tuitionem perpetuo adtribui. Urbs interea cryptae propinqua, quae hactenus Iria Flavia vocabatur, ex visu elucentis stellae potioribus auspiciis Compostellae sibi nomen imposuit. — Sed ad illustrandum Apostoli sepulcrum, praeter illud caeleste signum, non pauca divinitus facta sunt, ita ut non modo ex finitimis civitatibus et oppidis, sed a longinquis etiam locis ad sacros cineres supplicatum populi venirent. Quare Rex Alfonsus III Decessoris sui exemplum imitatus exaedificata nem amplioris templi aggressus est, tamen ut antiquus loculus intactus maneret, et illud properata molitione absolutum regio sumptu exornavit.

Exeunte saeculo X efferatae Arabum copiae, rursus in Hispaniam irruptione facta, oppida complura diripuerunt, ac magna civium edita strage, omnia ferro et incendiis vastarunt. Nefandissimus Emirus Almansor, quem sepulcri sancti Jacobi cultus non latuerat, ad direptionem et eversionem animum iam intenderat; quod si perficere potuisset, maximum Hispanorum praesidium, et in quo erat eorum spes omnis, sese expugnaturum arbitrabatur. Quapropter iis, quos praedonibus suis praefecerat, imperat Compostellam recta proficiscantur, urbem adoriantur, templum et sacra Omnia dedant igni delenda. At Deus exortum iam et dilapsum incendium ad presbyterii limen restinxit, et Almansorem eiusque copias foedis terminibus percussit, quibus divexati Compostella discesserunt et fere omnes cum Almansore subita morte perierunt. — Extabant adhuc sparsi circa hypogeum cineres hostilis ferocitatis reliquiae, divini praesidii documentum. Quibus e malis ubi se emersit Hispania, Compostellae Episcopus Didacus Pelaez, in ipsis ruderibus veteris templi ampliorem aedem ab inchoato excitavit, quae a posteriori Episcopo Didaco Gelmirez, splendidiore cultu et maiestate aucta Basilicae nomine et iure donata est. Huius Episcopi praecipua cura fuit sacras reliquias sibi traditas recognoscere, et educto in sublime pariete loculum inaccessum reddere. Quae inter agenda ex sacris ossibus particulam quamdam dissociare non dubitavit, eamque sancto Attoni Pistoriensi Episcopo adiectis litteris dono misit. Partem hanc ex hodierna peritorum inspectione compertum est demptam fuisse ex capite: ea enim est, quae apophisis mastoidea vocatur, sanguine adhuc respersa, utpote quae gladii ictu, quum caput cervicibus abscindentur, percussa est. Hae reliquiae prodigiorum fama et avita civium religione sanctae singulari pietatis studio coluntur adhuc ab Ecclesia Pistoriensi.— Interea Hispaniensis Sanctuarii fama longe lateque per vulgata, innumerabiles peregrinorum cohortes ex universis fere terrarum partibus illuc confluebant, et adeo crevit frequentia, ut ingentibus peregrinantium catervis ad sancta Palestinae loca et limina Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, merito compararentur. Ac proinde Romani Pontifices Decessores Nostri dispensationem voti de peragenda Compostellana peregrinatione suscepti, Apostolicae Sedi reservarunt.

Saeculo XVI nondum exacto, cohorta est foeda et atrox tempestas, qua per Hispaniam fere totam saeviente, sacrum Apostoli sepulcrum in periculo fuit non tam communi, quam proprio. Indicto enim bello Hispanos inter et Britannos, hi, qui a catholica fide ad haeresim desciverant, praedari et diruere catholicorum templa, et sacra omnia violare et delere sibi constituerant. Quapropter in Gallaecia, regione mari eitima, exposito exercitu, sacras aedes everterunt, caelitum beatorum imagines, reliquias et quae omnia sanctiora habentur, haeretico furore combusserunt, deinde ad perniciosam, ut aiebant, superstitionem extinguendam, Compost eliam versus castra moverunt. — Praeerat id temporis Compostellanae Ecclesiae piissimus Archiepiscopus Ioannes a sancto Clemente, qui collatis cum Canonicis consiliis de sacris Sanctorum reliquiis tuto in loco recondendis, hanc ^praecipuam de sancti Iacobi exuviis curam sibi suscepit. Sed cum iam hostes instarent, tumultuario opere ab eo clanculum tria corpora condita sunt : cavit tamen ut novus loculus ex veteris illius, romano more constructi, ruderibus constitueretur, ut aliquod superesset posteris earum identitatis testimonium. Postquam recessum ab armis et belli pericula propulsata sunt, cives Compostellani, et peregrini qui ea loca frequentes adiverant pro certo habebant sacros cineres eodem esse adhuc in loco ubi primitus composita requieverant. Posteri autem in ea opinione fuerunt qua maiores, ita tamen ut temporibus nostris censerent christifideles in abside sancti sacelli maioris eadem sacra pignora servari, quapropter illuc ad adorandum propius accederent, et Basilicae Clerus quotidianae supplicationi ibi cum antiphonae cantu finem poneret.

Cum vero Venerabilis Frater Noster S.R.E. Cardinalis Paya’Rico hodiernus Archiepiscopus Compostellanus aliquot abhinc annis restituendae Basilicae operam aggressus esset, consilium cepit, quod iamdiu agitabat animo, investigandi locum ubi sancti Iacobi, et discipulorum eius Athanasii et Theodori reliquiae sitae essent. Quare ad opus tanti momenti viros peritissimos delegit in ecclesiastica dignitate constitutos, qui operarios dirigerent. Sed praeter opinionem omnium res ceciderunt. Explorato enim toto hypogeo et latebris quotquot extant adhuc circum altare maximum nihil repertum est. Demum quo maior cleri et populi ad orandum ferebatur devotio, in centro scilicet absidis post altare maius, et ante aliud altare interius effossum est pavimentum, et cum opus ad duo cubi ta processisset, occurrit operariis arca, cuius in operculo crux insculpta videbatur. Arca erat lapidibus et lateribus confecta ex antiquiori crypta ac sepulcro excerptis. Remoto coram testibus operculo, ossa reperta sunt ad tria sceleta sexus virilis pertinentia. De iis omnibus Venerabilis Frater Cardinalis Archiepiscopus Compostellanus, secundum sacri Concilii Tridentini sanctiones, auditis doctorum piorumque virorum consiliis, et lectissimorum peritorum sententiis, processuales condidit tabulas, inquisitumque est, constaret ne in repertis reliquiis de identitate corporum sancti Iacobi Maioris Apostoli et duorum discipulorum eius Athanasii et Theodori? Haec omnia ad ecclesiasticae disciplinae praecepta perpendens, adhibitoque intelligenti iudicio, annuit et approbavit. Deinde idem Venerabilis Frater Archiepiscopus Compostellanus acta omnia et sententiam suam ad Nos misit, petiitque supplex, ut sententia eadem supremo Nostrae Apostolicae auctoritatis iudicio confirmaretur.

Nos admotas Nobis preces benigne excipientes, cum probe noverimus venerabile sancti Iacobi Maioris sepulcrum inter celeberrima sanctuaria iure posse censeri, quae in toto orbe terrarum a christianis coluntur, sacrisque celebrantur peregrinationibus ad suscepta vota persolvenda: idemque a Decessoribus Nostris Paschali II, Callisto II, Eugenio III, Anastasio IV et Alexandro III datis constitutionibus fuisse privilegiis et honoribus ornatum et auctum, voluimus ut ad tantum negotium ea conferretur diligentia, quam semper Apostolica Sedes adhibere consuevit.

Quamobrem ex Sacro Concilio sacris tuendis Ritibus praeposito, aliquot S. R. E. Cardinales destinavimus, nimirum Dominicum Bartolini Praefectum, Raphaelem Monaco La valletta, Miecislaum Ledochowski, Aloisium Serafini, Lucidum Mariam Parocchi, Angelum Bianchi et Thomam Zigliara ; nec non eiusdem S. Congregationis praesules Officiales dilectos Filios Magistros Vincentium Nussi Protonotarium Apostolicum, Laurentium Salvati ab actis, Augustinum Caprara Quaesitorem de honoribus caelestium, una cum Aloisio Lauri Assessore ; quibus idem negotium examinandum commisimus. Conventu habito ad Vaticanas Nostras Aedes die XX Maii vertentis anni, omnibus ad trutinam severa disquisitione vocatis, responsum datum est u dilata, et ad mentem ». Mens vero fuit ut nonnullae animadversiones gravioris momenti accuratius diiudicarentur. — Quae res ut expedite ad exitum perveniret, iussimus dilectum Filium Magistrum Augustinum Caprara, Sanctae Fidei Promotorem Compostellam proficisci, ut ibi singula quaeque inspiceret, inquireret, referret. Ille testibus, quos prius iusiurandum adegerat auditis; compositis nonnullis contradictionibus, quae in eorum relatione subesse videbantur; examinatis archeologiae, historiae et anathomiae peritis Matriti et Composteliae, qui de re sententiam ferrent ; inspectis vetustioris loculi ruderibus et cum his, quibus arca reliquias continens constituitur, comparatis, nec non inspecto loco sub abside ubi hae inventae sunt, demum quum rursus percontatus esset peritos physicos de singulis sacrorum ossium partibus, Romam reversus accurata relatione demandato sibi munere perfunctus est. — Quare iisdem collectis comitiis ad Vaticanum die XIX Iulii huius anni dubitationum discussa caligine et veritatis lumine clarius exorto ad propositum dubium u. An sententia lata a Cardinali Archiepi» scopo Compostellano de identitate reliquiarum, quae in centro abn sidis sacelli maximi Metropolitanae eiusdem Basilicae repertae » sunt et sancto Iacobo Maiori Apostolo, eiusque discipulis Athanasio et Theodore tribuuntur, sit confirmanda in casu, et ad effectum de quo agitur? » Dilecti Filii Nostri Cardinales itemque Praesules Officiales considerantes omnia, quae proposita erant, ita vera et probata esse, ut refellere nequis posset, ideoque cognitionem rei certam adesse, quae secundum sacros canones et Summorum Pontificum Decessorum Nostrorum Constitutiones in hisce negotiis desideranda est ita rescripsere: «Affirmative, seu sententiam esse confirmandam n.

Quae cum Nobis a dilecto Filio Nostro Dominico Cardinali Bartolini, eiusdem sacrorum Rituum Congregationis Praefecto, relata fuissent, non mediocri Nos laetitia affecti sumus; et toto ex animo Deo Optimo Maximo gratias egimus , cui placitum est ut Ecclesia sua, in tanta praesertim temporum iniquitate, novo hoc thesauro ditesceret. Propterea supra dictam peculiaris sacrorum Rituum Congregationis sententiam, libenter in omnibus ratam habuimus et confirmavimus. Insuper mandavimus ut die XXV Iulii sancto Iacobo Apostolo sacra Nostrum confirmationis decretum in Ecclesia Nationis Hispanicae sanctae Mariae de Monte Serrato in Urbe dicata, post Evangelii lectionem ex ambone publicaretur, praesentibus dilecto Filio Nostro Dominico Cardinali Bartolini, Sacrorum Rituum Congregationis Praefecto, et dilectis Filiis Magistris Laurentio Salvati ab actis, Augustino Caprara Quaesitore de honoribus caelestium, una cum Aloisio Lauri Assessore et Ioanne Ponzi pro tabulario.

Nunc vero ea, quae per supradictum decretum constituta sunt solemniore Apostolicae auctoritatis documento, novoque Nostrae confirmationis actu communire volentes, Decessorum Nostrorum vestigia persecuti, nempe Benedicti XIII, Pii VII et Pii IX, qui de identitate corporum sanctorum Augustini Pontificis Doctoris, Francisci Assisiensis, Ambrosii Pontificis Doctoris, Gervasii et Protasii martyrum iudicium tulerunt; Nos quoque quibuscumque dubitationibus et controversiis diremptis, Venerabilis Fratris Nostri Cardinalis Archiepiscopi Compostellani sententiam de identitate sacrorum corporum Beati Iacobi Maioris Apostoli, et sanctorum discipulorum eius Athanasii et Theodori, ex certa scientia, atque etiam motu proprio Apostolica auctoritate approbamus et confirmamus et in perpetuum firmam et validam fore decernimus. Praeterea volumus et iubemus, ne cui fas sit sacras Reliquias, quae iam in veteri conditorio repositae sunt et sigillo super obsignatae, vel earum particulas dissociare, demere vel adsportare sub poena excomunicationis latae sententiae, cuius absolutionem Nobis et Nostris Successoribus omnino reservamus. Quamobrem committimus et mandamus universis et singulis Venerabilibus Fratribus Nostris Patriarchis, Archiepiscopis, Episcopis ceterisque Ecclesiarum Praelatis praesentes litteras in sua unumquemque provincia, dioecesi et civitate solemniter publicare, ea meliori ratione, quam expedire censuerint; ut auspicatissimus huiusmodi eventus ubique innotescat, atque aucto pietatis studio illum christiani omnes celebrent, sacrasque peregrinationes ad sacrosanctum illud sepulcrum, quemadmodum maiores nostri facere consueverunt, suscipiant. — Et quo efficacius pro Ecclesia Stancta .Dei et pro universa christiana republica sancti Iacobi Apostoli et eius discipulorum patrocinium impetrare valeamus, omnibus et singulis christianis utriusque sexus, qui vere poenitentes die per locorum Ordinarios seligenda confessi, et Christi corpore refecti in templis ubilibet sancti Iacobi Apostoli Deo dicatis, et iis deficientibus in quolibet templo ab Ordinariis designando, pro instantibus gravissimis Ecclesiae necessitatibus eiusque exaltatione, pro haeresum improbarumque sectarum extirpatione, sancti Iacobi suppetiis imploratis, pias apud Deum preces effuderint, plenariam omnium peccatorum Indulgentiam ac remissionem quae per modum suffragii etiam animabus piacularibus flammis detentis applicari possit, benigne in Domino tenore praesentium concedimus. Et quoniam nobilissima Hispanica Natio mirifica sancti Iacobi ope fidem catholicam integram inviolatamque servavit, ut Deus misericors ei gratiam impertire velit, propter quam in tanta errorum colluvione, Patrono suo apud Deum medio et sequestro ad sanctitatem religionis avitae et ad pietatis studium firmet animum, amplissimum privilegium ab Alexandro III Decessore Nostro ei concessum, lucrandi scilicet plenarium Iubilaeum eo anno quo festum sancti Iacobi XXV Iulii incidat in Dominicam diem, etiam pro venturo anno concedimus cum ea ipsa die sancto Iacobo sacra festa solemnia inventionis et elevationis corporis eius agenda erunt, ea servata methodo, et cum iisdem facultatibus in Constitutione ipsius Summi Pontificis data die XXV Iulii anni MCLXXIX contentis. Has quoque litteras et quaecumque in eis contenta nullo unquam tempore de subreptionis vel obreptionis seu nullitatis aut invaliditatis vitio seu intentionis Nostrae, vel alio quovis defectu notari, impugnari, sed semper et in perpetuum validas et efficaces esse et fore, suosque plenarios et integros effectus sortiri et obtinere ; sicque ab omnibus cuiuscumque gradus, ordinis, praeeminentiae et dignitatis censeri volumus; mandantes, ut earumdem praesentium transumptis etiam impressis manu tamen alicuius publici Notarii subscriptis, et sigillo Personae in ecclesiastica dignitate constitutae munitis, eadem prorsus fides adhibeatur, quae ipsis praesentibus adhiberetur, si forent exhibitae vel ostensae. Nulli ergo omnino hominum liceat hanc paginam Nostrae approbationis, ratificationis, reservationis, concessionis, relaxationis, commissionis et voluntatis infringere, vel ei ausu temerario contraire. Si quis autem hoc attentare praesumpserit, indignationem Omnipotentis Dei et beatorum Petri et Pauli Apostolorum eius se noverit incursurum.

Datum Romae apud Sanctum Petrum anno Incarnationis Dominicae millesimo octingentesimo octuagesimo quarto, Kal. Novembris, Pontificatus Nostri anno septimo.

  1. CARD. SACCONI

PRODATARIUS.

  1. CARD. CHISIUS.

VISA DE CURIA I. DE AQUILA E VICECOMITIBUS.

Loco illius Plumbi Reg. in Secret. Brevium.

  1. CUGNONIUS.

Our Lady of Mt. Carmel

Translation of the Preface from the Carmelite Missal:

Vere dignum et justum est, aequum et salutare, nos tibi semper, et ubique gratias agere: Domine sancte Pater omnipotens, æterne Deus: Qui per nubem levem, de mari ascendentem, immaculatam Virginem Mariam beato Eliæ Prophetæ mirabiliter præsignasti: eique cultum a filiis prophetarum præstari voluisti. Quos autem beata Virgo, (hodierna die) per sacrum Scapulare, in filios dilectionis assumpsit, eodemque indutos ac pie morientes, ad montem sanctum tuum quantocius perducere digneris. Et ideo cum Angelis et Archangelis, cum Thronis et Dominationibus, cumque omni militia cælestis exercitus, hymnum gloriæ tuæ canimus, sine fine dicentes: Sanctus, etc.

           Truly it is right and just, profitable and salutary, for us always and everywhere to give thanks: O holy Lord, Father almighty, eternal God, who through a light cloud rising up from the sea, wondrously foreshadowed the Immaculate Virgin Mary to Blessed Elias (Elijah) the Prophet: and wished her cult to be furnished by the sons of the prophets. Those, however, whom the Blessed Virgin (on this very day) has selected as sons of goodwill through the holy Scapular, would you also deign, all the sooner, to lead them clothed by the same [scapular] and dying piously with it, to your holy mountain. And therefore, with the Angels and Archangels, with Thrones and Dominions, and with the whole militia of the heavenly army, we sing a hymn of your glory, without end saying: Sanctus, etc.

See also: Mediatrix Press Carmelite Sale.

More of the Francis Effect: Bad Satire

Readers may recall my article dissecting a fake news piece that got linked to the Drudge Report and other sites as “actual news”. There is, sadly, a good deal more of that going on. There is an ever increasing proliferation of fake news, attempting to copy the Onion, some of it decent, some of it in bad taste. And of course, there is a lot of proliferation of Pope Francis fake news.

Admittedly, Francis is an easy target, and I am not uncritical of the Pope. Unguarded and careless statements, made off the cuff or otherwise, have become almost legendary. We have had, to name a few, “Who are you to judge”; “We don’t have to be like rabbits”; “The Reform of the Reform is a mistake”; “We need a one world political authority”; “We need a miracle for the Family to accept scandalous things” etc., all verified and true statements that have caused great concern and consternation among Catholics. Then we can add his actions, appointing an open manifest heretic, Fr. Timothy Radcliffe, O.P., to a pontifical council, giving a platform to pro-abortion UN divines for his encyclical, inviting lesbians to the Vatican or apologizing for sharing the faith in Latin America, have likewise caused such scandal that, one can almost believe Francis would say anything. Increasingly, I find this sentiment amongst friends who go to the Novus Ordo. It’s not a Trad thing anymore.

Still, the latest is completely absurd: “Pope Francis says unwed mother’s must be forcibly sterilized to stop climate change.” The website is obviously fake, and it cites the source as Francis’ encyclical, where the Pope actually said the opposite (no. 50). This did make the rounds and in spite of it’s absurdity, some news sites and people, particularly on facebook, did accept it as fact, even though a quick google search would have pulled up an easy snopes article showing it is false (which is less work than verifying through the Vatican website, as I suggested the last time I wrote on this topic).

Now, the fake news article in itself is not particularly of interest to me. Rather, I have several observations.

1) That people could or would accept this is evidence of how poorly team Bergoglio has managed the Pope’s message. The frequent gaffes and off the cuff statements referenced above, combined with instant clarification from Fr. Lombardi, and the use of the Pope’s words by the media, whether in context or not, are evidence of the complete failure of the Vatican Press Office and others to use media to present what the Pope wants to teach, and as a result, people are prepared to believe anything. One can only blame the media so much, as it is obvious the secular media has an axe to grind against the Church, and poorly made and ill-prepared statements only give them the perfect opportunity. It doesn’t exculpate the media, but at the same time, the Vatican clearly needs to control how it presents info. All we need to do is turn back to John Paul II’s pontificate to witness an efficient and well run press office. Those who know me, or followed the old incarnation of this website, know I was no fan of that pontificate, nevertheless, John Paul II’s messages were carefully prepared and crafted, he never made off the cuff remarks that could be easily misinterpreted and taken miles in another direction by the media, let alone things disparaging to Traditional Catholics, though he no doubt strongly disagreed with them (e.g. Francis’ many pejorative terms for those cultivating traditional spirituality).

2) There is a wider critique here than Francis, which is the credulity our culture places in news, and it’s lack of discernment in regard to sources. Too often we read headlines, and take that to be true without any further question. The Drudge Report is an obvious example. Only crazy news junkies click on every single link and discerningly read every story. In reality most people skim and click on the more interesting stories. On top of that, Drudge then has a lot of power to manipulate headlines to his particular point of view. For example, one time he linked an article and wrote the headline: “Organic food contains ecoli”, but when you went to the article it was organic food sent to a packing plant that was contaminated with ecoli originating with conventional food. Such is the power of headlines. Not to say Drudge is evil, but it would be foolish to think he didn’t have his own agenda, and he would certainly admit to it, unlike the MSM.

3) This website is but one of many proliferating fake news under the guise of satire. The success of websites like The Onion has spawned a legion of fake news sites, well produced, tolerably written that are supposed to be “satire”. There are two problems with this.

a) A lot of these news outlets hire out writers and accept nearly anything, which is just stuff re-written from other news articles, and can include many false or incorrect things. I know this because I’ve earned money doing this on various contracting websites for writing, though I never wrote anything I knew to be false. Others did and it was clear. The goal is to get content with buzzwords that brings more clicks and increase advertising revenue. This doesn’t help inform the public, or provide any beneficial service. Internet has provided us with an easy way around the Main Scream Media, to reach out and provide news, find news, and in another word, form alternative media without them. The problem comes in with the fact that anyone can do this, and create nonsense. Alternative media needs to be self policing and adhere to strict standards itself, to prevent the proliferation of fake news.

b) Just as importantly, the proliferation of fake news occurs under the guise of  “satire”. It would be helpful if we reviewed what satire really is. According to the Oxford English dictionary Satire is: “the use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.” It uses irony, juxtaposition, oxymoron, humor and other things to mock something else.

 There are several modes of satire, and it has been realized differently by different peoples. For the classical culture, i.e. Greek and Roman culture, satire could be a poem or prose that makes a mockery of social movements or peoples. It is often only understood by context (which is why St. Jerome famously burned his copy of Juvenal, saying “If you weren’t written to be understood, to the fire with you.”), and makes play of contemporary things. One of my favorite verses of Satire is from

Quintus Horatius Flaccus

Horace:
Parturient montes, et nascetur ridiculus mus. (Ars Poetica,  139)
The Mountanins will labor, and a ridiculous mouse will be born.

The point of this is to poke fun at great labors which produce meagre results. In Fr. Vincent McNabb’s biography of St. John Fisher, he applies this verse to Cromwell’s great labor to open the safe in the Rectory of the Bishop of Rochester, thinking there was some great treasure inside. Cromwell employed several blacksmiths to get it open, and when it was done they found—a hair shirt!

Or Again:

Non satis est puris versum perscribere verbis.
It is not enough to lay out refined words in verse. (Satira, bk 1 Satire IV, line 54)

Here he means that some poets think they’re clever by literary devices, but there is no content being applied to them, similar to a history book name dropping all sorts of books but failing to provide a unified narrative to make the history intelligible. And so on and so forth. I could talk much more about classical literature, but this will do for now.

More recent satires can be seen in the 19th century with the British magazine Punch. While putting down a revolt in India, General Sir Charles Napier took the province of Sind, and he sent a dispatch back: “I have Sind.” Punch displayed the headline in Laitn: Peccavi. Today that would fall on deaf ears, but in an age where all the readers of Punch could be counted on to have classical educations, they would know that meant “I have sinned”, and thus the pun.

Or in another mode, Chesterton declared: “Politicians and diapers should be changed often, and for the same reason.”

Or more recently, after the Pope used a “burger king” as his sacristy in Bolivia, the Onion ran a satirical photoshop of Pope Francis flipping burgers on the balcony of St. Peter’s. This is amusing and useful satire, it draws attention to Francis condemning international capitalism, while using a creation of that for his mega liturgy in Bolivia. Now, in fairness to Francis, that might have been the only facility suitable for this purpose, who knows. The point remains.

All these are examples of satire to bring attention to cultural or political events. They make good satire, within the contexts they were written in. Part of today’s problem is that the culture is just so weird, it is almost impossible to satire. I wonder if Wodehouse or Waugh would be able to satire today’s culture? Perhaps not. The overarching point is that the proliferation of this fake news is not truly satirical, and frankly dangerous, because we are approaching a point where we can’t really know anything. When you read about a place called Russia, to which you have never been, you are taking it on natural faith that it is there, because people tell you or show you satellite photos or pictures purportedly from there. What if someone was to tell you that there is no such place, that it is a hoax produced in a studio with photo and video and the whole history is manufactured? If you have never been there, normally such while possible would not be plausible, for so many books could not be written, or a whole language created, so many people certain about a country that does not exist. Potentially, the endless proliferation of fake news makes such scenario somewhat plausible.

Interview 020 – Charles Coulombe revisiting the American Revolution


John_Singleton_Copley_001Download [Right Click]                 Play in New Window

Smaller Version:          Part 1          Part 2             Part 3

On Independence day we decided to celebrate in an entirely different way, with a re-examination of the American Revolution against Great Britain, the factors involved, and numerous details not found in your history books.  Charles Coulombe, a writer, researcher and fellow pipe-smoker joins us to shed light on the inconvenient details of early American history hidden from your history books.
NB: After the interview we discussed a matter which should have perhaps prefaced it: many people will be mad at this, especially if you are of tea-party persuasion. The charge of “treason” and “unpatriotic” behavior will be leveled, I’m sure. Patriotism, properly love of the land and countrymen, is a virtue, distinct from the thoughtless worship of the government. We both adhere to the former, as every good Catholic should since true patriotism is a virtue; while have nothing to do with the latter.

Resources for Charles Coulombe:

Charles_CoulombeMuse in the Bottle (my personal favorite)
History of the Popes
Puritan’s Empire
The Pope’s Legion: The Multi-national Fighting Force that defended the Vatican
Haunted Places in America: A guide to spooked and spooky places

Interview Notes

School House Rock: No More Kings
The Quebec Act
Freedoms given Catholics were Denounced by Declaration of Independence: or abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies”
[This is a whole bunch of nonsense, the word “Abritrary government” is an old WASP buzzword for Catholicism, they extended freedom in Quebec which the apostles of “Liberty” found intolerable]
Taxes were Higher after the American Revolution
Cost of the Seven Years War (French and Indian war)
John Hancock smuggled tea
Shays Rebellion over high taxes after the revolution
Unruly Americans (reference to taxes pg. 29)
American Heresy
Lord North
Viscount Howe
Cousin’s wars
For detailed analysis of anti-Catholic propaganda during the English Civil War, see: “The English Civil War: Papists, Gentlewomen, Soldiers and Witchfinders” by Dianne Purkiss. Excellent work.
First legal Catholic Church in the Empire since James II
Appointments in England, Scotland, Ireland, made by Henry, Cardinal Duke of York (brother of Bonnie Prince Charlie).
Rebels tended to be closer to the centers of power or wealth, whereas loyalists tended to be more poor.
War of the Regulators
American President more powerful than any monarchy
For more on recycling of the same propaganda during the American Revolution, see the documentation in Liberty the God that Failed, by Chris Ferrara.
John Pym
Trial of Charles I, claimed that he negotiated with the Pope
Rome ready to offer a red hat to Bishop Laud
Debate between Laud and a Jesuit named Fisher
Scots Highlanders tended to be English Loyalists
Flora MacDonald
Letter of Continental Congress to England concerning the Quebec act (drafted by John Jay for the Congress)
Letter of Continental Congress to Quebec
Father (later Bishop) John Carrol excommunicated by Bishop of Quebec
Traveled to Quebec with Benjamin Franklin
St. Elizabeth Anne Seton
Samuel Seabury
Scottish Episcopal Church
Lord Dunmore offered Freedom to any slave who would join the British Army
Blacks in the Colonies were pro-British
Samuel Johnson opposed Independence
Benedict Arnold
Founding Fathers and Freemasonry
Catholic British Loyalists
Jacobite Rebellion
Aude Sapere 004 – Scottish Independence
History of Scotland: Shadow King (overview of Jacobite Wars through Culloden – No longer available, probably copyright.
Continental Congress offered the Crown of the United States to Bonnie Prince Charlie in 1778
Just in case you are too young to remember Theodoric of York
Culloden Moor
Bishop Hay, vicar apostolic of Scotland

Interview 019 – Fr. Joannes Petrus Part 2: Freemasonry and the Occult


Download [Right Click]       Play in New Window

pilgrimage-of-grace-bannerWhat follows is part 2 of my interview with Fr. Joannes Petrus on Revolution and counter-revolution, discussing in particular Free Masonry and the Occult, as well as the connection to Egypt, the recent Supreme Court Decision on homosexuality, lust in the culture, ecumenism and points for Traditional Catholics to avoid in taking up true authentic Counter-Revolution. Utterly fascinating.

 

Continue reading

Interview -019 Fr. Joannes Petrus on Revolution and Counter Revolution Part 1


Download [Right Click]             Play in New Window

pilgrimage-of-grace-bannerToday we are joined by Fr. Joannes Petrus, a priest who has researched and studied revolution as well as the occult, masonry and history. Continue reading

Interview 018 – Chris Ferrara discusses Laudato Si


Download [Right Click]        Play in New Window

Smaller/Mobile Version:             Part 1       Part 2        Part 3        Part 4

pope_francis_eco-friendlyToday we are joined by Chris Ferrara, the president of the Catholic Lawyers Association, a well known Columnist for the Remnant, the author of The Great Façade, The Church and the Libertarian, and his magnum opus: Liberty: The God that Failed. Chris today, comments on where Francis appears to be taking us with Laudato Si. Should we cheer the anti-globalist sentiments and the condemnation of Malthusian approaches? Should we celebrate the few scant references to abortion? Or are there foundational problems with the language in the encyclical that we should be weary of? Should Distributists harken to the condemnations of globalism and abuse of resources? Or is there a radical departure from the tradition of Catholic thought which we should be worried about? Join us for an in depth conversation on the document.

Continue reading